Results of the surgical treatment in children with Chiari malformation type I.

PURPOSE: Our study aimed to evaluate the quality of life of the patients operated due to Chiari malformation type 1 (CM-1) in the Department of Pediatric Neurosurgery, Medical University of Silesia in Katowice. METHODS: We performed a retrospective analysis of 11 patients diagnosed with CM-1 who were treated in our center in the years 2007 to 2016. There were 6 female and 5 male individuals. Short-term evaluation of the outcome was based on comparison of the presenting symptoms and radiological images before and after the surgical treatment. Long-term follow-up was carried out using survey questionnaires based on the Chicago Chiari Outcome Scale (CCOS) devised originally by Aliaga et al. RESULTS: Patients, based on their CCOS score were divided into three groups marked as "improved," "unchanged," and "worse," depending on a range of CCOS score: 13-16, 9-12, 4-8, respectively. The outcome of patients was as follows: 6 patients (55%) were evaluated as improved, and 5 (45%) as unchanged. No patient was classified as worse after surgery. Significant negative Spearman's correlation was found between the CCOS score and patients' age at the time of surgery (R = - 0.85, p = 0.0009). CONCLUSIONS: The decision of whether to operate pediatric patients with CM-1 should be considered very carefully. In our department, the main indication for surgery was the occurrence of clinical symptoms. Our study revealed that in the symptomatic patients, surgery improves their quality of life measured with CCOS.

Endovascular treatment of complex intracranial aneurysms.

PURPOSE: Complex intracranial aneurysms (CIA) are heterogenous group of intracranial vascular malformations. Due to its giant size, difficult location, broad neck, branches arising from the aneurysm, wall structure, calcification, presence of intraluminal thrombus or previous treatments it requires more careful approach. The aim of this study was to evaluate endovascular treatment results of CIA in our Department. MATERIAL AND METHODS: In order to differentiate CIA from all the aneurysms, treated endovascularly in years 2008-2014, authors proposed their own qualification criteria. Additionally, subgroup of patients with CIA with simultaneous subarachnoid haemorrhage (SAH) was divided. Clinical outcomes of patients were assessed with Glasgow Outcome Scale (GOS), while radiological outcomes were assessed with Montreal Scale. Aneurysm localization, incidence of aborted procedures, intraoperative complications were also evaluated. RESULTS: Internal carotid artery was the most common localization in both CIA and non-complex (nCIA) groups. Incidence of aborted procedures was significantly higher in CIA group than in nCIA (25% vs. 7%; p < 0.01). CIA group had worse Montreal scores then nCIA group (1.90 vs. 1.49; p < 0.01). Clinical outcome in GOS scale in patients with SAH and CIA was significantly worse than in SAH and nCIA (2.86 vs. 4.06; p = 0.04). CONCLUSIONS: To conclude, proposed criteria of CIA should be taken into consideration during diagnosis and qualification to invasive treatment. Classifying aneurysm as CIA is related to greater possibility of aborting endovascular procedure due to technical difficulties.